By Roger L. Geiger
American clinical supremacy was once equipped upon the energy of our examine universities. This ebook exhibits how those universities laid the root for the ascendancy of yank technological know-how within the first 1/2 this century, after they went from being provincial outposts of overseas technological know-how to being the equivalent of the simplest eu facilities of studying. it is a wealthy social heritage that tells a lot not just concerning the development of yankee better schooling but additionally approximately American highbrow lifestyles in most cases and the politics of clinical study in schooling. How did learn emerge as a big functionality of universities? How did universities reconcile the calls for of an lively study software with their different institutional commitments? to reply to those questions, Geiger levels over a large spectrum of subject matters, from the adoption of a selective admissions coverage and the advance of graduate colleges to the ongoing energy of liberal arts schools inside collage settings. The booklet comprises attention-grabbing sections at the strange try to militarize collage campuses in the course of global struggle I and at the backlash of the 1920's, while many significant campuses turned extra serious about social lifestyles than highbrow concerns. One notable characteristic of the improvement of study universities, Geiger issues out, was once that it used to be principally comprehensive via inner most assets. person philanthropy used to be answerable for setting up the wealth of the personal examine universities, and performed a key function at a number of country universities besides. Foundations and firms have been additionally hugely major in constructing the associations' learn functions. Geiger describes how each one college resolved in its personal approach the clash among the examine position and different institutional commitments. the main examine associations he offers with are Harvard, Yale, Princeton, MIT, Columbia, Cornell, Pennsylvania, Stanford, the collage of Chicago, Johns Hopkins, the California Institute of expertise, and the colleges of Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and California.
Read or Download To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940 PDF
Similar history_1 books
The Cambridge History of American Theatre: Volume 2: 1870-1945
Quantity starts within the post-Civil conflict interval and strains the advance of yank theater as much as 1945. It discusses the position of vaudeville, eu impacts, the increase of the Little Theater stream, altering audiences, modernism, the Federal Theater circulate, significant actors and the increase of the megastar method, and the achievements of amazing playwrights.
- The teachings of Karl Marx by V. I. Lenin
- History Skills: A Student's Handbook, 2nd edition
- Will in Western Thought. An Historico-Critical Survey
- Contest Problem Book IV: Annual High School Examinations, 1973-1982 (Anneli Lax New Mathematical Library 29)
Extra info for To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940
Sample text
A chronology of some of the institutional milestones along the road to discipline formation is presented in Table i. 6 Although these founding dates have a real importance for this process, they in no case mark the beginning of the subject in question. The proliferation of disciplinary institutions that occurred in the i88os and the 18905 should be seen as one phase in the constantly shifting patterns of American learned societies. In the preceding period scientific organizations were typically inclusive and heterogeneous, with only loose and occasional links to higher education.
Departments, however, remained wedded, by and large, to the parent discipline. "43 Large, vital disciplinary communities operated an autonomous system for evaluating and rewarding scientific merit. The growing authority of departments thus meant increased reliance upon this system. In this way the reward system of science that was lodged in the academic disciplines became more nearly identical with the institutional rewards that the universities had to offer. As a result, the academic marketplace that first became evident in the 18905 in the competition for a relatively few recognized scholars and scientists gradually came to govern most faculty positions.
1856) or the Memoirs of Alexander Agassiz's Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard College (f. 1864) were the outlets for research done in those institutions. In this respect they resembled the publications of the institutes associated with chairs in German universities. It was thus quite natural for research-oriented departments in American universities to adopt this same approach. Most of the titles in Table 2 bearing the name of their school, or those called "studies," "notes," or "contributions," 34 T0 ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE were primarily intended to disseminate the scholarship of local faculty and graduate students.