Download Cancer Drug Design and Discovery by Stephen Neidle PDF

By Stephen Neidle

The last word resource of knowledge at the layout of recent anticancer brokers, emphasising small molecules, this most modern paintings covers fresh amazing successes as a result of the human genome and melanoma genomics initiatives. those advances have supplied info on ambitions occupied with particular cancers which are resulting in potent medications for no less than many of the universal strong tumours. designated sections clarify the fundamental underlying ideas of melanoma drug improvement and supply a realistic creation to fashionable tools of drug layout. attractive to a huge viewers, this can be a very good reference for translational researchers attracted to melanoma biology and drugs in addition to scholars in pharmacy, pharmacology, or medicinal and organic chemistry, and clinicians taking oncology ideas.

Show description

Read or Download Cancer Drug Design and Discovery PDF

Best oncology books

Energy Balance and Gastrointestinal Cancer

The gastrointestinal music presents one of many exact platforms the place a number of malignancies, together with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, esophagus and colon are each one linked to weight problems. This distinct organization is roofed during this quantity of strength stability and melanoma from the epidemiologic, biologic and power etiologic point of view.

Brain Metastases from Primary Tumors. Epidemiology, Biology, and Therapy

With an annual fee of greater than 12 million international diagnoses and seven. 6 million deaths, the societal and financial burden of melanoma can't be overstated. mind metastases are the most typical malignant tumors of the crucial fearful procedure, but their prevalence seems to be expanding inspite of the development of melanoma cures.

Branching Process Models of Cancer

This quantity develops effects on non-stop time branching strategies and applies them to check fee of tumor development, extending vintage paintings at the Luria-Delbruck distribution. for this reason, the writer calculate the chance that mutations that confer resistance to remedy are current at detection and quantify the level of tumor heterogeneity.

Additional info for Cancer Drug Design and Discovery

Example text

2005). Phase II and tumor pharmacodynamic study of gefitinib in patients with advanced breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 10, 5323–5333. J. C. (2006). Genetically engineered models have advantages over xenografts for preclinical studies. Cancer Res. 66, 3355–3359. , Smith, C. et al. (2004). A threehybrid approach to scanning the proteome for targets of small molecule kinase inhibitors. Chem. Biol. 11, 211–223. A. et al. (2006). Validing cancer drug targets. Nature 441, 451–456. J. and Radisky, D. (2001).

And Landis, J. (2004). Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 711–715. L. (2004). Non-toxicity endpoints in Phase I trial designs for the targeted non-cytotoxic agents. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 96, 977–978. M. et al. (2001). Clinical trial designs for cytostatic agents: are new approaches needed? J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 265–272. , Berger, U. et al. (2005). 5-year follow-up. Cancer 103, 1659–1669. , Peck, D. et al. (2006). The Connectivity Map: Using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes and disease.

There are significant differences between Phase I trial designs for cytotoxic versus the new molecularly targeted agents. Escalation to the maximum tolerated dose may not be appropriate with the new targeted drugs. 8 CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK they tend to be cytostatic rather than cytotoxic. Hence, the use of response rates by RECIST criteria in the Phase II setting may not always be appropriate. Randomized discontinuation trials have proved informative in some cases. In addition to differences in assessing the tumor, it is also clear that different side-effects are seen with the new molecular therapeutic agents compared with the old cytotoxics, often involving non-proliferating tissues.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.56 of 5 – based on 20 votes